Post by Admin on Aug 25, 2004 7:31:41 GMT -5
This article may be too geeky for some, but it is a comprehensive guide to dealing with spyware:
www.michaelhorowitz.com/removespyware.html
My strategy:
I run checks with both Ad-Aware and Spybot every day or so and have Spyware Blaster installed to prevent spyware from installing. Neither Ad-Aware or Spybot alone is enough by itself; both catch what the other one misses. Spybot now has a cool feature called immunize that allows you to prevent lots of known spyware from installing in the first place. You may find this a nuisance as it will notify you each time you enter a site that uses DoubleClick and Avenue A [both programs that determine what ads you will see based on your surfing habits]. Personally I'm happy with it; I'd rather click on dozens of acknowledgements that tell me a program is being deterred than expose myself to thousands of known instances of spyware.
Ad-Aware Personal edition: www.lavasoftusa.com/
Spybot: www.safer-networking.org/en/index.html
Here is a handy Spybot tutorial: www.safer-networking.org/en/tutorial/index.html
Spyware Blaster: www.javacoolsoftware.com/spywareblaster.html
All 3 programs are free for personal use. They all accept donations, though, and I strongly encourage everyone to give a little when they can so that the programmers at these companies can continue to create Good Stuff.
And while I'm talking about privacy . . . check out this site, Consumers Against Supermarket Privacy Invasion and Numbering: www.nocards.org/
The site authors explain how supermarket loyalty cards not only invade your privacy but are quickly leading to 2- or 3-tiered pricing systems, meaning that those who spend the most money (I keep reading the figure that the top-spending 30% of shoppers account for 75% of a store's income) will be given the lowest prices. They address the idea of using fake id details and conclude that it doesn't solve the problem and in fact makes it worse (in part by increasing the expense of the program, which of course is passed on to the consumer). They also look at RFID tags, which have revolutionized checkouts at my public library but may not be what I want to see in my supermarket or department store (see the article about how Gilette tested a program that snaps a picture of each person who removes a package of razors from the store shelf). Companies hope that consumers will be "apathetic" enough to be resigned to what seems like an inevitable loss of privacy.
www.michaelhorowitz.com/removespyware.html
My strategy:
I run checks with both Ad-Aware and Spybot every day or so and have Spyware Blaster installed to prevent spyware from installing. Neither Ad-Aware or Spybot alone is enough by itself; both catch what the other one misses. Spybot now has a cool feature called immunize that allows you to prevent lots of known spyware from installing in the first place. You may find this a nuisance as it will notify you each time you enter a site that uses DoubleClick and Avenue A [both programs that determine what ads you will see based on your surfing habits]. Personally I'm happy with it; I'd rather click on dozens of acknowledgements that tell me a program is being deterred than expose myself to thousands of known instances of spyware.
Ad-Aware Personal edition: www.lavasoftusa.com/
Spybot: www.safer-networking.org/en/index.html
Here is a handy Spybot tutorial: www.safer-networking.org/en/tutorial/index.html
Spyware Blaster: www.javacoolsoftware.com/spywareblaster.html
All 3 programs are free for personal use. They all accept donations, though, and I strongly encourage everyone to give a little when they can so that the programmers at these companies can continue to create Good Stuff.
And while I'm talking about privacy . . . check out this site, Consumers Against Supermarket Privacy Invasion and Numbering: www.nocards.org/
The site authors explain how supermarket loyalty cards not only invade your privacy but are quickly leading to 2- or 3-tiered pricing systems, meaning that those who spend the most money (I keep reading the figure that the top-spending 30% of shoppers account for 75% of a store's income) will be given the lowest prices. They address the idea of using fake id details and conclude that it doesn't solve the problem and in fact makes it worse (in part by increasing the expense of the program, which of course is passed on to the consumer). They also look at RFID tags, which have revolutionized checkouts at my public library but may not be what I want to see in my supermarket or department store (see the article about how Gilette tested a program that snaps a picture of each person who removes a package of razors from the store shelf). Companies hope that consumers will be "apathetic" enough to be resigned to what seems like an inevitable loss of privacy.